The Old-School Liberal

“Freedom granted only when it is known beforehand that its effects will be beneficial is not freedom” — Friedrich Hayek

Posts Tagged ‘Presidential Race’

Would a Ron Paul Presidency Hurt Israel?

Posted by Poorsummary on January 16, 2008

Israel FlagSome have claimed that a Ron Paul presidency would be bad for Israel. Shimshon Weisman, an orthodox jew who lives in Israel, begs to differ (thanks to Lew Rockwell for the post):

There are a number of issues here. First, aid to Israel. It has been obvious for a long time that Israel does not need this aid. Israel’s GDP per capita is at European levels and rising. The aid itself is a form of corporate welfare in that it must be spent in America. It comes with many strings attached.“It allows the government to avoid sorely needed economic reforms.

“Along with the aid Israel receives, potential or actual enemies receive several times more. That aid doesn’t just allow the recipient nations to avoid reforms, it actually props them up and allows them to continue to maintain a bellicose stance against Israel (this certainly includes Egypt, with whom Israel has a peace treaty in place).

“When the entire world condemned Israel, including President Reagan on down in America, Dr. Paul supported Israel’s right to act in its own self-interest (and preemptively, I might add) in its bombing of the Osirak reactor in Iraq. He had absolutely nothing to gain by taking this position, and nothing to lose by following the herd in its condemnation of Israel.

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in 2008 Presidential Race, Politics, Ron Paul | Tagged: , , , , , , | 4 Comments »

Ron Paul: The Most Electible Republican

Posted by Poorsummary on December 2, 2007

Ron Paul AdThe 2008 presidential election is rapidly approaching, and Republicans are going to have a difficult time holding onto the presidency after the Bush administration. Prediction markets like Intrade provide a fairly accurate assessment of the probability of each candidate winning the primary nomination, as well as the probability of each candidate becoming president. In determining which candidate to send to a general election, however, primary voters should choose the candidate most likely to win the general election, given that they receive the primary nomination.

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in 2008 Presidential Race, Current Events, Politics, Ron Paul | Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Ron Paul: the Centrist Republican

Posted by Poorsummary on November 14, 2007

Centrist

While the mainstream media has panned Ron Paul as a “fringe candidate,” it turns out he may be the most centrist of all the Republican candidates. Ask any democrat you know what the 2 most important issues are in this presidential election and you’re likely to hear “the environment,” and “the war.”

Since its hard to know exactly what a candidate will do based on what they say in debates (remember Bush’s “humble” foreign policy with no nation building?) it’s important to look at their actual previous behavior. For congressman and senators, this means their voting record.

The environmental advocacy group League of Conservation Voters publishes a National Environmental Scorecard for every Congress since 1970. According to their website, “The Scorecard represents the consensus of experts from more than 20 respected environmental and conservation organizations who selected the key votes on which Members of Congress should be graded.”

Suffice it to say the democrats lead the pack on the environment (bear in mind that the costs of such bills are not taken into consideration), but when it comes to the Republicans, something very interesting has occured. Ron Paul was the most environmentally friendly Republican presidential candidate rated. Here are the life-time scores (note that the other front-runners, Guliani and Romney, are omitted since they were not congressmen or senators): Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in 2008 Presidential Race, Current Events, Politics, Ron Paul | Tagged: , , , , | 2 Comments »

Romney working hard to put food on his family?

Posted by Poorsummary on October 22, 2007

Romney, from the latest Fox news debate:

All of us on the stage are Republican. But the question is, who will be able to build the house that Ronald Reagan built — who will be able to strengthen that house, because that’s the house that’s going to build the house that Clinton, Hillary, wants to build”

Huh? With uncharacteristic disheveled hair, Romney began tonight’s debate on the wrong foot with this particularly jumbled anthropomorphism of a residential dwelling. The Republican front-runners (with the notable exception of Ron Paul) have long followed suit with Bush on the Iraq war, but now Romney has gone one step further by mimicking Bush’s blundering public speaking skills.

In all fairness, letting one’s tongue get ahead of one’s brain is something every politician and public speaker deals with from time to time. What Romney, Guliani, and the rest of the neo-conservative bunch need to worry about is their disrespect for the constitution, the rule of law, the concept of truly limited government, and individual freedom. Unfortunately, principled, just, and economically sound leadership requires that we allow people to make decisions that are not always the best for them– the reason being that bureaucrats in Washington, if they make the decisions for us, are going to get it much more wrong much more often. To quote Jacob Hornberger, “If you are not free to choose wrongly and irresponsibly, you are not free at all.” An unwillingness of the public to recognize the inherent ineptitude of government in making the correct decisions for individuals is what underlies most of the biggest political blunders of history– from prohibition, to social “security,” to the war on drugs, the war on poverty, the war on terror, and any other wars on abstract nouns we care to dream up. Most people choose to deal in abstracts, ignoring the unintended consequences and inherent violence of government action. Fighting poverty sounds good, but forcibly taking from the industrious to give to those in need is less appealing. Fighting drug use seems like a no-brainer, but “drug use” is an abstract concept that only exists as a shorthand for describing the activities of those who choose to use drugs. The typical politician ignores the injustice of his actions, turning a blind eye to those hurt by the policy he peddles, eager to shake another hand or kiss another baby of someone equally willing to ignore the blatant injustices of a coercive, paternalistic state. To see this phenomenon, this time exhibited by Mitt Romney, but equally practiced by the social planners and statists across the simplistic, one-dimensional political spectrum, click here.

In related news, Ron Paul did not fair quite as well with the pro-war Florida crowd as with crowds past, receiving more boos than any candidate other than Hillary Clinton. It seems the Republican party is suffering from what HBS professor Clayton Christensen calls the “Innovators Dilemma“– the phenomenon of businesses catering so closely to their existing customer base, that they lose sight of the unmet needs of the population as a whole, and are subsequently displaced by new, innovative technologies. In this case, everyone but Paul insists on pandering to the largely pro-war republican base, while losing sight of the vast majority of Americans that wants it to end (and fast– sorry, Hillary; no decade-long pull-out strategy will do). Will the Republican party insist on throwing away an election on an already lost (and virtually unwinnable) war? Probably not– whoever wins the nomination will likely have a convenient change of heart and start talking a lot more about getting out of Iraq after the primaries.

Posted in 2008 Presidential Race, Current Events, Politics, Ron Paul | Tagged: , , , , , , | 2 Comments »